Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
English | Spanish
Editorial
Revistas / Journals
Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología Metaverse Basic and Applied Research Data & Metadata Interdisciplinary Rehabilitation Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología - Serie de Conferencias Community and Interculturality in Dialogue Seminars in Medical Writing and Education Health Leadership and Quality of Life Gamification and Augmented Reality Southern perspective / Perspectiva austral
Current Archives
About
About the Journal Submissions Editorial Team Privacy Statement Contact
×
English | Spanish
Editorial

Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología Metaverse Basic and Applied Research Data & Metadata Interdisciplinary Rehabilitation Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología - Serie de Conferencias Community and Interculturality in Dialogue Seminars in Medical Writing and Education Health Leadership and Quality of Life Gamification and Augmented Reality Southern perspective / Perspectiva austral
Current Archives

About the Journal Submissions Editorial Team Privacy Statement Contact
Original
Published: 2024-05-27
DOI: https://doi.org/10.56294/piii2024320

Maximizing Solar Harvest: Comparing P&O and Incremental Conductance MPPT Methods

By
Benchikh Salma ,
Benchikh Salma

Advanced systems engineering laboratory, Ibn Tofail University, Kenitra, Morocco

Search this author on:

PubMed | Google Scholar
Jarou Tarik ,
Jarou Tarik

Advanced systems engineering laboratory, Ibn Tofail University, Kenitra, Morocco

Search this author on:

PubMed | Google Scholar
Lamrani Roa ,
Lamrani Roa

Advanced systems engineering laboratory, Ibn Tofail University, Kenitra, Morocco

Search this author on:

PubMed | Google Scholar

Abstract

This paper presents a comprehensive comparative study between two prominent Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) algorithms: the Perturb and Observe (P&O) method and the Incremental Conductance method (IC). The study delves into their operational principles, efficiency, robustness, implementation complexity, response time, and sensitivity to parameter changes. Through theoretical analysis and numerical simulations, the strengths and limitations of each algorithm are thoroughly assessed, offering valuable insights for optimizing photovoltaic (PV) systems. These simulations utilize established mathematical models of PV systems and MPPT algorithms. The findings reveal nuanced differences between the P&O and Incremental Conductance methods. Incremental Conductance demonstrates superior efficiency, particularly in environments with dynamic irradiance levels and partial shading conditions, owing to its ability to dynamically adjust the operating point. However, it exhibits increased implementation complexity compared to the simpler and more robust P&O method. In conclusion, this comparative study offers valuable insights into MPPT algorithm optimization for PV systems. While Incremental Conductance excels in efficiency and adaptability, P&O remains a viable option for applications with limited computational resources or stable environmental conditions due to its simplicity and robustness

Keywords:

Photovoltaic system,
Perturb & Observe,
Incremental Conductance,
Maximum Power Point Tracking,

How to Cite

1.
Benchikh S, Jarou T, Lamrani R. Maximizing Solar Harvest: Comparing P&O and Incremental Conductance MPPT Methods . SCT Proceedings in Interdisciplinary Insights and Innovations [Internet]. 2024 May 27 [cited 2024 Jul. 5];2:320. Available from: https://proceedings.saludcyt.ar/index.php/piii/article/view/320

Copyright Notice

The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

Vol. 2 (2024)
See full issue

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.